Serbia
Categories Score
The full bar chart stands for 100%, and is filled by the country category score. The colour display uses the traffic light palette, with Green representing a score closer to 100% and Red a score closer to 0%.
ASYLUM
This category looks into laws that expressly include SOGISC as a qualification criteria for seeking asylum. We also take into account other legislation, policies, instruction or positive measures by state actors that are related to asylum addressing the needs and rights of LGBTI asylum seekers and refugees.
Criteria Compliance Ratio
Each pie charts stands for a category and is divided in slices by criteria. When a country complies with a criteria – fully or in some regions – the slice is coloured.
Keep in mind the criteria have different weighting factor within a category; for example, the criteria Prohibition of medical intervention without informed consent (intersex) stands for half (2.5%) of the INTERSEX BODILY INTEGRITY category weighting factor (5%). Meaning that even if a country can only comply with this specific criteria within the category (1/4 total criteria) the category scores 50%.
More information on the categories and criteria weighting factors here.
Category & Criteria Table
The table lists detailed information and insights on legislation supporting each criterion status. Please use the filters for in-depth analysis.
n/a = not applicable, meaning the criteria didn’t exist in the previous Rainbow Map edition (PROGRESSION column)
- Complies
- Applicable in some regions only
- Does not Comply
RECOMMENDATIONS
In order to improve the legal and policy situation of LGBTI people in Serbia, ILGA-Europe recommend:
- Adopting legal measures to recognise and protect same-sex couples, such as marriage equality or registered partnership
- Reforming the legal framework for legal gender recognition to be fair and transparent, based on a process of self-determination and free from abusive requirements (such as GID/medical diagnosis, medical intervention, compulsory sterilisation or compulsory divorce)
- Prohibiting medical interventions on intersex minors before they are able to give informed consent, and establish effective monitoring mechanisms to ensure enforcement of this ban
Annual Review OF Serbia
In our Annual Review of the Human Rights Situation of LGBTI People in Europe and Central Asia, we examine the advances made and provide concrete examples of on-the-ground situations at national level country-by-country in the 12 months from January to December 2025.
Read our Annual Review of Serbia below for more details and stories behind the Rainbow Map. You can also download the Annual Review chapter (.pdf) covering Serbia.
-
In 2025, Rainbow Ignite, in its report The Rights of Sexual and Gender Minorities in Serbia, recorded instances of same-sex couples being denied rental housing or services due to perceived sexual orientation. Amnesty International similarly noted persistent structural discrimination against LGBTI persons in everyday transactions and service access.
-
In September, a European Parliament report noted that Serbia has enacted a legal framework recognising persecution on the grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity as a basis for granting asylum. While commending this legislative development, the Parliament urged the authorities to improve sensitivity training for asylum officers in order to prevent refoulement and secondary victimisation in practice.
-
Throughout 2025, hate speech by politicians and religious officials -particularly from the Serbian Orthodox Church — remained unpunished, as reported by Human Rights Watch and by Rainbow Ignite, which further documented similar institutional tolerance for homophobic discourse and the normalisation of anti-LGBTI rhetoric in media and politics.
-
Throughout 2025, hate speech by politicians and religious officials -particularly from the Serbian Orthodox Church — remained unpunished, as reported by Human Rights Watch and by Rainbow Ignite, which further documented similar institutional tolerance for homophobic discourse and the normalisation of anti-LGBTI rhetoric in media and politics.
-
In 2024, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) recommended that Serbian authorities urgently establish a comprehensive system for effectively monitoring racist and LGBTI-phobic incidents in schools, including clear procedures for reporting, sanctioning perpetrators, and supporting victims. Serbia has since developed the national platform “Čuvam te / I Protect You” to prevent and respond to violence involving children, but the platform fails to explicitly recognise or address violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression.
-
According to Open for Business, workplace exclusion and wage gaps contribute to income insecurity among LGBTI people in Serbia, increasing their risk of poverty and limiting access to adequate food. These findings draw in part on data and qualitative input from the Serbian LGBTI organisation Rainbow Ignite, which contributed to the Open for Business analysis. Within this research, a significant proportion of LGBTI respondents reported having no income, while more than half earned below the national average, highlighting the link between economic discrimination and basic living standards.
In 2025, Rainbow Ignite reported in The Rights of Sexual and Gender Minorities in Serbia that, although Serbian labour law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and, through the provision of “other personal attributes,” indirectly protects gender identity and expression, the lack of explicit recognition of gender identity leaves many trans and non-binary individuals vulnerable in practice. The report also underscored that persistent barriers to equality remain in the labour market, including low rates of permanent employment, high unemployment levels, and widespread workplace mobbing and harassment against LGBTI persons. Within this context, women and non-binary respondents reported the highest exposure to hostile work environments, reflecting the intersectional challenges faced by marginalised groups within Serbia’s workforce.
-
In September, Jelena Jerinić of the Green–Left Front (ZLF) submitted a draft Law on Civil Partnership to the National Assembly. The proposal seeks to provide legal recognition for same-sex partnerships, an issue long advocated for by LGBTI organisations in Serbia. The next procedural step depends on whether the President of the National Assembly, Ana Brnabić, places the draft law on the parliamentary agenda for debate and potential adoption.
-
In June, Novi Sad Pride Week took place under heightened police security, following an attack earlier in May when a lit flare was thrown at participants during a drag performance. Organisers described the attack as “indicative” of the broader climate in Serbia, where authorities have been accused of fostering a culture of violence and tolerating assaults on activists.
-
In December 2024, members of the Movement of Socialists (Pokret Socijalista), led by Aleksandar Vulin, introduced a draft Law on the Special Registry of Agents of Foreign Influence to Serbia’s National Assembly. The proposal would require non-profit organisations and media outlets receiving 50% or more of their funding from abroad to register as “foreign agents.” The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) issued a warning that the draft law poses a significant threat to Serbia’s democratic development and its progress toward European Union integration, expressing concern that such legislation would severely restrict civil society, media freedom, and citizens’ associational rights. The draft had not been adopted by the end of 2025 and remained pending before the National Assembly.
-
In November, the European Commission 2025 Report on Serbia flagged back-sliding in freedom of expression. While formal legal guarantees exist, the Commission highlighted that media remain subject to strong political and economic influence, undermining newsroom independence and pluralism. Journalists and media outlets face an environment where self-censorship and external interference prevail.
-
In 2025, access to gynecological and reproductive healthcare for lesbian, bi+ and trans (LBT) women in Serbia remains legally guaranteed but often undermined by stigma and provider bias. Rainbow Ignite’s 2025 survey found that 42% of lesbian and bisexual respondents delayed or avoided gynecological visits due to fear of discrimination, and only 27% felt safe disclosing their orientation to doctors. While national cervical screening programs exist and formal equality is guaranteed by the Law on Patients’ Rights, implementation gaps persist. The Equality Commissioner previously ruled that excluding people with same-sex relationships from reproductive cell donation was discriminatory, showing how institutional bias can infiltrate regulations.
-
In 2025, in Serbia, the right to bodily integrity for LGBTI people remains under serious pressure according to the Fundamental Rights Agency’s (FRA) “Country Factsheet on Serbia.” The factsheet noted that 32% of respondents reported they had experienced conversion practices to change their sexual orientation or gender identity – compared to 24% for the EU’s 27 member states.
-
According to the FRA’s “Country Factsheet on Serbia”, 80% of respondents reported avoiding holding hands with a same-sex partner often or always (compared to 53% for the EU-27 average) and 43 % said they avoided certain places for fear of assault (EU-27: 29%). Only 29% of respondents said they were “fairly or very open” about being LGBTI (EU-27: 51%), 45% of respondents reported feeling discriminated against in at least one area of life in the preceding year (EU-27: 37%).
The full Annual Review for 2026 is available here.